Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:Did\s+they\s+blow\s+up\s+all\s+the\s+567\s+turbo\s+motors\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Re:Did they blow up all the 567 turbo motors? (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@EarthLink.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:35:45 -0600
Wolfee, Over its manufactured existence, the 567 engine (not motors, motors are the components mounted on the truck assembly that drive the wheels) in the 16 cylinder configuration went from 1350 h.p
/archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00169.html (12,558 bytes)

2. [BRHSlist] Re:Did they blow up all the 567 turbo motors? (score: 1)
Author: "wollffee" <wolfee@onebox.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:07:41 -0600
Bill, thanks. I would be interested to know the changes that occurred when the 567 went from "B" configuration to "C". Were these just minor details? Did all the 567's get upgraded to whatever the cu
/archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00170.html (9,187 bytes)

3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Did they blow up all the 567 turbo motors? (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 07:49:54 -0600
1st question: To the railroads I don't think these were "minor details". Don't know all the details, I'm not a machinist, although if you want real facts I could have a machinist answer this. I do kn
/archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00183.html (11,939 bytes)

4. [BRHSlist] Re:Did they blow up all the 567 turbo motors? (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@EarthLink.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:44:26 -0600
"Wolfee" The transition from 567-B to 567-C was a major change and probably the most visible change in terms of engine appearance. All of the 567 engines prior to the "C" model had rectangular hand h
/archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00187.html (11,432 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu