Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:Bituminous\s+vs\.\s+Lignite\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:Bituminous\s+vs\.\s+Lignite\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: Gene Tacey <taceys@g...>; Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 18:03:56 -0500; Not sure where the Division point was. May have been McCook for west of there since engines were changed there. The visible features for a lignite burner are the extended smokebox and a small yellow; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00079.html (8,209 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: KPMF16@a...; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 01:57:06 EDT; Some of the Q's engines had Coffin feed water heaters that may be mistaken as "bulging smoke box extensions." Is this the case here? Ken Thompson [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00082.html (6,913 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: Gene Tacey <taceys@g...>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 17:57:46 -0500; No, Lignite burners had a overhanging look since the smokebox was extended. The extension was the entire smokebox, whereas coffin FWH form an arch when installed and look more like a huge eyebrow. Th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00084.html (7,902 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: KPMF16@a...; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:05:39 EDT; Thanks Gene, Now I've learned more about the Q's steam. I do recall seeing a pic of one of these extended smokebox engines and wondering why. Ken Thompson [Non-text portions of this message have been; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00086.html (6,961 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@i...>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 18:30:42 +1200; Ken Have a look at Bulletin #29 - there's quite a bit about lignite burners in the article, particularly around page 33 Rupert one; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00087.html (7,559 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite (score: 1): Author: Steve Wintner <steve_wintner@y...>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:10:19 -0700 (PDT); As I understand it, some locomotives had the coffin heater inset into the smokebox, thus eliminating the eyebrow. This forced the stack to be farther aft, so this could produce a funny proportion. Im; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-08/msg00089.html (8,919 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]