BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite
From: Gene Tacey <taceys@g...>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 17:57:46 -0500
References: <9b.191e2dcf.28a38032@a...>
No, Lignite burners had a overhanging look since the smokebox was extended. The
extension was the entire smokebox, whereas coffin FWH form an arch when 
installed
and look more like a huge eyebrow. The extensions contained extra screening 
since
Lignite (i.e. Sub-Bituminous) coal has far less BTU's per weight than bituminous
resulting in much more ash being created when burned. You can tell by looking at
locomotives in the same class and see the overhang.
Gene

KPMF16@a... wrote:

> Some of the Q's engines had Coffin feed water heaters that may be mistaken as
> "bulging smoke box extensions." Is this the case here?
>
> Ken Thompson
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>