BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Re:Bituminous vs. Lignite
From: Gene Tacey <taceys@g...>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 18:03:56 -0500
References: <997258873.448.93468.l10@yahoogroups.com> <p05100302b7972227fa4f@[63.205.10.88]>
Not sure where the Division point was. May have been McCook for west of there
since engines were changed there. The visible features for a lignite burner
are the extended smokebox and a small yellow square on the top rear of the
coal bunker (not easy to see in many photographs).
Gene

Denny Anspach wrote:

> Friends, a number of CB&Q steam locomotives were originally
> constructed for, or were converted later to use specifically either
> Bituminous coal (Illinois), or Lignite (Wyoming?). As I understand
> it, Hastings NE was the dividing point in this regard.
>
> Now, just exactly were the specific differences between locomotives
> equipped to burn one or the other? I do note in Corbin's book that
> some locomotives have the appearance of really marked smoke box
> extensions, while others of the same class do not- with no
> explanation.
>
> One caption mentions that the bulging smoke box was to provide a
> much bigger chamber for unconsumed lignite particles to burn out
> before being pushed out the stack. Is this bulging smoke box one of
> the features exclusive to lignite, and in this regard, some, or all?
> Would an order for new locomotives X number for bituminous, and Y for
> lignite then come from the manufacturer with these respective and
> distinctive smokebox differences?
>
> Denny
> --
> Denny S. Anspach, MD
> Sacramento, CA
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>