Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+SD38\-2s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+SD38\-2s\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: SD38-2s (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:32:42 EST; Terry - You're obviously an "outsider", where the view is different. Are you on the Frisco and Santa Fe lists, too? Bob [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-01/msg00158.html (6,473 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: SD38-2s (score: 1): Author: "John Lewis" <CBQJohn@m...>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 14:56:04 -0800; Terry and all, I don't about the lines west territory, but as for my stomping grounds of West Quincy, the Q folks were still very much an influence. Funny how the 'Northern' aspect never seemed to en; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-01/msg00162.html (7,912 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: SD38-2s (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 19:31:22 EST; << Terry and all, I don't about the lines west territory, but as for my stomping grounds of West Quincy, the Q folks were still very much an influence. Funny how the 'Northern' aspect never seemed to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-01/msg00163.html (6,682 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: SD38-2s (score: 1): Author: KPMF16@a...; Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:38:50 EST; I've talked to quite a few people whom had either began their railroad careers under the Q or the BN in the 70's. To back up what John said, the general consensus is that the ex Q lines were still ru; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-01/msg00174.html (6,869 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]