Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Posting\s+of\s+calendar\s+art\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Posting\s+of\s+calendar\s+art\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Posting of calendar art (score: 1): Author: Val Nelson <super-chief-val@c...>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 23:26:04 -0500; For what it's worth, Stadivari never copyrighted any of his instruments. The calendars, however, are copyrighted. But I would think that the railroad would have much better things to do than go chasi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00170.html (11,181 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Posting of calendar art (score: 1): Author: railbass@a...; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 15:21:57 +0000; On the copyright issue of a "fallen flag" logo, I suggest you read the Mainline Commentary by Robert Hundman in the June 2003 issue of Mainline Modeler. Bob discusses UP's requirements for logo licen; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00172.html (11,806 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Posting of calendar art (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:33:30 -0700 (PDT); I don't know about the 1941 calendar, but the 1965 calender hanging in my offfice is NOT copyrighted. And by the way, just because something is a "commissioned work of art" does not mean it is copyri; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00174.html (12,693 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]