- 1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: OS - Was Suggested Reading (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Decker" <mdecker@g...>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:59:37 -0700
- Hi Folks: Re: "OS". I've always understood it to mean "On Sheet", where the Operator was reporting to the Dispatcher that a train had arrived, and/or departed. When they ran the CTC through Edgemont,
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00328.html (10,334 bytes)
- 2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: OS - Was Suggested Reading (score: 1)
- Author: "William Franckey" <budapest@g...>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:59:11 -0600
- It believe "Doc" OS'd the double header at Mendota on Sunday Only (Thundering Skies)...Bill -- Original Message -- From: "Mike Decker" <mdecker@g...> To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, Dece
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00330.html (11,557 bytes)
- 3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: OS - Was Suggested Reading (score: 1)
- Author: PSHedgpeth@a...
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 12:07:37 EST
- RE: Train register checking. I believe, if memory serves correctly, that the rules specifically forbade checking the train register against an extra train unless authorized to do so by the dispatcher
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00345.html (7,268 bytes)
- 4. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: OS - Was Suggested Reading (score: 1)
- Author: John Mitchell <cbqrr47@y...>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 21:34:35 -0800 (PST)
- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00351.html (8,065 bytes)
- 5. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: OS - Was Suggested Reading (score: 1)
- Author: PSHedgpeth@a...
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:58:37 EST
- Ed and list The primary situation that comes to mind is where an extra train is given right over an opposing extra or even a scheduled train. When said opposing extra or scheduled train arrived at th
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00362.html (9,889 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu