Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+IMPORTANT\!\s+Commercial\s+Posting\s+Policy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+IMPORTANT\!\s+Commercial\s+Posting\s+Policy\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [BRHSlist] Re: IMPORTANT! Commercial Posting Policy (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <charlie@k...>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:32:03 -0500; DaveI would like some clarification..... If I (or Nolan) or any other Manufacturer wants to send an informational post (Shipped HO Business Cars today, for example....no we won't see them until July,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00290.html (13,499 bytes)
2. RE: [BRHSlist] Re: IMPORTANT! Commercial Posting Policy (score: 1): Author: "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:23:30 -0500; Warren, You are correct, a lot of thought went into this policy. When I used the term collective "Burlington Route" I did so to include all predecessor roads and subsidiaries. As far as putting Comme; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00292.html (8,880 bytes)
3. RE: [BRHSlist] Re: IMPORTANT! Commercial Posting Policy (score: 1): Author: "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:54:52 -0500; Bill, In the spirit of the policy, I feel it would be best to send these to John for review and have them posted on Friday. We'll leave it up to our able List Moderator to determine if the Commercial; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00295.html (12,207 bytes)
4. RE: [BRHSlist] Re: IMPORTANT! Commercial Posting Policy (score: 1): Author: "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:05:30 -0500; OK...I knew there would be tough questions to clarify the policy...so here goes: The answer is what I feel is a common sense answer...the example you gave should be OK anytime during the week and doe; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00296.html (8,569 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]