Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Follow\-on\s+Sections\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Follow\-on\s+Sections\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J. Levine" <sjl@p...>; Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 22:14:38 -0500; Glenn I was not so lucky about being on time on my trip on #10 in June of 1966. We were running 20 cars, pulled by four motors in a forward, backward, backward, backward arrangement. We had air hose; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00046.html (9,457 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: drale99@a...; Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:12:57 EDT; Another example of the extent of follow-on operations, was on the NY Central in the late 20's and early 30's. The 20th Century ran out of NY City with as many as seven sections. These were all-pullma; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00050.html (6,957 bytes)
3. RE: [BRHSlist] Re: Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: "Dave_Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>; Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:19:13 -0500; Glen, If my calculations are correct, the train would have more than filled the entire bridge. The bridge is 1,972 feet from bank to bank. With 27 cars at a conservative average of 80' each, and 5 lo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00056.html (8,508 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: "Rick Keil" <rkeil6721@h...>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 11:30:44 -0500; Thanks for the information. It really did enlighten me to real world operations and some modeling possibilities. Rick Keil Omaha, NE I really enjoyed all of the posts on the second-section operations; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00067.html (8,287 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]