Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+CB\&Q\s+Proposed\s+Steam\s+\-\s+\"D\-8\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+CB\&Q\s+Proposed\s+Steam\s+\-\s+\"D\-8\"\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: CB&Q Proposed Steam - "D-8" (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:03:15 -0500; Not really. The Bachmann loco has 63" drivers; the proposed hog has 52" drivers....the same as a USRA 0-8-0. It does have a little more modern architecture than the D-4s but looks more like them tha; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00194.html (9,638 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: CB&Q Proposed Steam - "D-8" (score: 1): Author: "zephyr9903" <zephyr9903@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:28:06 -0600; "Fascinating", as Mr. Spock would say . . . wasn't the diamond stack a preextended-smokebox adaptation for lignite burning? And the reference to inside delivery steampipes also brings up some thought; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00198.html (10,637 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: CB&Q Proposed Steam - "D-8" (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:30:45 -0500; MarshallI don't think these were rebuilds...there is no reference to "rebuild" anywhere on the drawing. The date on the drawing is obscured but it looks like it was prepared when the D4s were too new; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00200.html (11,749 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]