Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+RE\:\s+Brookfield\s+Derailment\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+RE\:\s+Brookfield\s+Derailment\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] RE: Brookfield Derailment. (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 06:20:11 -0500; Karl, As I said, the appearance was of a higher speed impact than would be possible if only gravity was involved. I may have not known anything else but I did know that yard. How about if the "Snuffi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00001.html (8,249 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] RE: Brookfield Derailment. (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:27:07 -0700 (PDT); Every section foreman would tell you that rerailing on a switch frog is a big NO NO. For one thing, it is very hard on the ties (cuts and breaks them). Changing switch ties is not a whole lot of fun!; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-04/msg00179.html (7,923 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]