Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Passenger\s+F\-3\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Passenger\s+F\-3\'s\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Passenger F-3's (score: 1): Author: "VLBG" <VLBG@s...>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:15:07 -0600; Hubert, This was from an old block sheet from West Eola. It caught my eye because there were two 996x sets going West on the same day. I will try to find it again but I think it was around Christmas; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00251.html (7,185 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Passenger F-3's (score: 1): Author: SilvrDome@a...; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:29:47 EST; Thanks for checking. There are multiple shots of the KCZ behind F-3's (circa 1953 and beyond), so it makes perfect sense they would be called to duty handling the "American Royal" or "American Royal; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00253.html (6,821 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Passenger F-3's (score: 1): Author: "VLBG" <VLBG@s...>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:11:58 -0600; Hubert, The actual day is Wednesday, 9-Jan-52. On Monday of that week #2 had the 3006. Have three days in a row. Not all Operators recorded engine numbers so it is a spotty sort of record. The 1st or; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00345.html (8,057 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Passenger F-3's (score: 1): Author: SilvrDome@a...; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:24:16 EST; Russ, Thanks for your information! It's to see a snapshot in time with regards to loco assignments. Hubert [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00368.html (6,644 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Passenger F-3's (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 03:04:31 EST; Russ - Was this a train sheet from West Eola tower? Lost most of this thread so that's why I'm asking. If the Rock Falls WF turned at Rock Falls, it wouldn't need an ATC equipped engine. Bob Campbell; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00391.html (6,675 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Passenger F-3's (score: 1): Author: "VLBG" <VLBG@s...>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:44:39 -0600; Bob, You are correct, of course. I just don't know how they handled the operation in 1952. If they were using the 9208 out of Eola then the 9207 would have to be at Rock Falls. It was just part of a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00394.html (7,927 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Passenger F-3's (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:17:05 EST; Too bad old Franny Pauls isn't with us anymore. He used to be the Eola RH "man" who knew and performed his job well. I'm sure he could have explained the locomotive assignments at the time. He looked; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00397.html (6,922 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]