- 1. Re: [BRHSlist] Livestock Trains (score: 1)
- Author: "Ray Bedard" <tczephyr@h...>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 07:52:06 -0700
- Doug, I have the May 1951 freight schedule and here's what if shows: DENVER TO CHICAGO Lv Denver 7:00PM Mon. Arriving at: McCook 2:40AM Tue. Hastings 8:00AM Lincoln 11:00AM Creston 6:00PM Ottumwa 10:
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-05/msg00088.html (8,921 bytes)
- 2. Re: [BRHSlist] Livestock Trains (score: 1)
- Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 16:42:17 -0500
- Doug/Ray, The CB&Q only used a small number series for freight train numbers. The were constantly repeated from route to route. Between 60 and 99 there are only 40 possible numbers and they had to co
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-05/msg00089.html (10,591 bytes)
- 3. Re: [BRHSlist] Livestock Trains (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Weber" <eng95@a...>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 15:27:18 -0700
- Bob. The CB&Q only used a small number series for freight train numbers. The were constantly repeated from route to route. Between 60 and 99 there are only 40 possible numbers and they had to cover
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-05/msg00090.html (7,448 bytes)
- 4. Re: [BRHSlist] Livestock Trains (score: 1)
- Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 17:44:19 -0500
- Bob, Yes, I think the point was that if a car left Chicago on #61 every possible connection to every major destination was covered by the same number. There were Willis Yard to Savanna trains for eac
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-05/msg00091.html (8,219 bytes)
- 5. Re: [BRHSlist] Livestock Trains (score: 1)
- Author: Steven Holding <hold-on@s...>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 01:03:55 -0500
- Most any freight train could handle livestock. Livestock could not be kept confined to a car for longer then 28 hours by Federal Law unless a release was signed for up to 36 hours. In a bygone era wh
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-05/msg00094.html (9,469 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu