Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+LaCrosse\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+LaCrosse\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] LaCrosse (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:37:57 -0500; The freight main line was always single track. The passenger main ran via downtown. Is it a bottleneck? Yes it is. Chances of change? Zero. South of Grand Crossing it crosses a wetland area and South; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00242.html (7,578 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] LaCrosse (score: 1): Author: Steven Holding <hold-on@s...>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:55:31 -0500; Not reinstalled after the massive flood in the late '60 as well as other places . E Winona, Trevino, PDC. Yes they are bottlenecks. BUT that is modern railroading. Reason why truckers beat us sjh --; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00259.html (7,418 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] LaCrosse (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:13:22 -0500; Steve, What was not re-installed after floods? That was East Winona not La Crosse. The bridges at Crawford and Mears were built as single track. Never any double track there. For that matter it was s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00260.html (8,459 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]