Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Follow\-on\s+Sections\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Follow\-on\s+Sections\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J. Levine" <sjl@p...>; Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 22:03:33 -0500; The 1956 Denver Zephyr during the summers or winter holidays would have so much business that one train could not carry it all. So the train would be split in two and additional cars added to each of; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00025.html (9,306 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: asychis@a...; Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 23:20:44 EDT; Rick, Often times a second or even more sections would be added to cover heavy traffic volume, such as at holidays or possibly during heavy vacation traffic. Or a second section may run on a passenge; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00026.html (8,289 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: John Mitchell <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:57:04 -0700 (PDT); Wrong, green classification lights, on the engine, not green markers, on the rear end, indicate a section following. Green markers show a train clear "in the hole", to be passed. ____________________; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00027.html (10,652 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J. Levine" <sjl@p...>; Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 22:57:04 -0500; The Veranda had green marker lights and our train was moving at speed.\ sjl; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00029.html (11,456 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 03:23:58 EDT; Steve & others - With no intent to "flame" anyone but just to clarify some terminology: The green marker (marker denotes rear of train) should have been displayed (on the rear car) in the forward dir; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00030.html (8,733 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: Wes Leatherock <wleath@s...>; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:34:34 -0500 (CDT); You're basically correct in the reason for trains running in more than one section, but the green flags or green lights were displayed on the front of the engine were classification lights ("class li; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00032.html (9,814 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: Wes Leatherock <wleath@s...>; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:40:05 -0500 (CDT); [ ... text deleted ... ] It wasn't just typical, it was required by the rules. Sorry, the last section carried NO signals. White lights (not markers) or flags designated an extra train (one without a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00033.html (7,988 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:52:23 EDT; Bob Campell et al As I read through the various posts which had accumulated overnight re "follow on sections" I was jumping up and down re the incorrect terminology regarding "markers"...I thought we; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00034.html (10,100 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Follow-on Sections (score: 1): Author: asychis@a...; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:29:19 EDT; Correct, the final section carried no flags or lights. Missed that one when I shouldn't have. Jerry Michels; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00038.html (7,155 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]