Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Fluting\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Fluting\s+again\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Fluting again (score: 1): Author: "leclaireq" <barbarland@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:50:04 -0600; I was looking through my the archives and was wondering about the small Buud fluting. I have a post that said it was on 1 inch centers. Is this correct and am I correct in the fact that this fluting; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00255.html (8,863 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Fluting again (score: 1): Author: "zephyr9903" <zephyr9903@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:14:50 -0600; You are essentially correct. The "square" cross-section has a slight "draw" or taper (probably to prevent any tendency to cut the metal while forming), but this taper is too slight to detect in any c; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00256.html (9,558 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Fluting again (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:17:00 -0500; IIRC even the small fluting was "dished" very slightly....the corrugations were not, at any rate, "square" having rounded corners in all instances. In HO and N if you can get it square I think you wi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00257.html (9,774 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Fluting again (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:58:30 -0700 (PDT); They had a "filet". By design, the fluting was made to make the stainless steel sheets stronger (more ridgid). Square corners cause "stress concentrations", a very bad thing. Welcome to Mechanical De; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00258.html (11,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]