Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Dimensions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Dimensions\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Dimensions (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:38:58 +1200; I notice that the recorded Outside Length of all types of cars increased by 2' 6" sometime between 1957 and 1966. Companies are always trying to increase profit margins by stretching their capabiliti; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-07/msg00094.html (8,510 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Dimensions (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 21:01:11 -0700 (PDT); Rupert You have it right. I don't know the date (but it was around 1960), it became official, but the old length was end sill to end sill, and the new one was from buffer to buffer(i.e. the inside su; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-07/msg00095.html (9,618 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Dimensions (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:55:42 +1200; Thanks, John. Was this just the CB&Q which had measured cars this way or did all companies affect the change? With interchanges, one would think there were benefits in uniformity. Can any one pinpoin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-07/msg00097.html (10,620 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]