- 1. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1643 (score: 1)
- Author: "Ralph W. Brown, Jr." <cbq682@g...>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 07:44:54 -0600
- This must have been a really small budget operation if THEY were buying used equipment from TP&W! ! ! They had a former NYC 0-8-0 7296 in 1954. It was replaced in 1958 by Lima-Hamilton 302 ex TP&W 30
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-04/msg00000.html (6,660 bytes)
- 2. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1643 (score: 1)
- Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:49:17 -0600
- Ralph, Actually purchased through Industrial Maintenance Services in Hammond. A small rebuilder/dealer that was in the Monon engine facility at Hammond. Did a lot of industrial switch engine work for
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-04/msg00001.html (8,076 bytes)
- 3. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1643 (score: 1)
- Author: William Barber <clipperw@E...>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 19:38:36 -0600
- Pete - I think the RR you may be thinking of was, IIRC, the Indian Hill and Iron Range. I saw it once in 1957. It had very little track of its own, maybe none. In steam days, it had only one locomoti
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00372.html (7,688 bytes)
- 4. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1643 (score: 1)
- Author: Don Ross <don0731@g...>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 20:04:28 -0600
- They had a former NYC 0-8-0 7296 in 1954. It was replaced in 1958 by Lima-Hamilton 302 ex TP&W 302 which was scrapped in 1968. In 1964 they acquired a VO1000 from Chicago Short Line where it was 101
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00373.html (8,838 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu