Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Digest\s+Number\s+1578\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Digest\s+Number\s+1578\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1578 (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@E...>; Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:30:11 -0600; John, I appreciate the comments. From a sound warning standpoint, what happens in those areas where whistles are restricted, such as the Chicago commuter territory. Unless a clear and present danger; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00380.html (7,533 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1578 (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>; Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:49:32 -0600; Bill, That may be an interesting question. AFIK the FRA does not recognize whistling restrictions as valid Railroad Operating practices. For example La Crosse actually did pass an ordinance but the B; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00381.html (8,574 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]