BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1578

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1578
From: William Barber <clipperw@E...>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:30:11 -0600
In-reply-to: <1043838994.344.10758.m12@yahoogroups.com>
John,

I appreciate the comments. From a sound warning standpoint, what happens in those areas where whistles are restricted, such as the Chicago commuter territory. Unless a clear and present danger is apparent, the engineer would not normally sound the horn.

Bill Barber

On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 05:16 AM, BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com wrote:

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:40:10 -0800 (PST)
From: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1577

They may win at trial, but on appeal they usually
lose, at least in the State of Illinois. Here the law
is clear, the train has the right of way. Now if the
rr does not sound a warning, the signals are not
working, or the view is obsructed, the motorist MAY
win. Just observations from a country lawyer!
John D. Mitchell, Jr.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>