Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+CB\&Q\s+F\s+Units\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+CB\&Q\s+F\s+Units\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] CB&Q F Units (score: 1): Author: Jim's Junction/ John & Debbie Olson <trains28@a...>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:16:59 -0700; John, The F-2 through the F-9 models all had the same wheelbase so the Life-Like mechanism will work just fine (as well as the Stewart, Stewart/Kato, Genesis or InterMountain Rwy). I think the 'Q's c; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-02/msg00317.html (10,090 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] CB&Q F Units (score: 1): Author: JWelther@a...; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:17:22 EST; John, I'll jump in here. First, I'm new to this list and a recent fan of the "Q" circa 1950 - 1963 as I plan on building a layout based on the St. Louis are of that time. I came here to learn about t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-02/msg00320.html (7,623 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] CB&Q F Units (score: 1): Author: JWelther@a...; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:23:43 EST; John, The F-2 was built on the same frame as tthe F-3. If memory serves me correctly EMC was anxious to get the F-3 out into the marketplace but at that time only had the basic components ready (fram; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-02/msg00322.html (7,068 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] CB&Q F Units (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 01:50:59 EST; As far as I know.... that never happened on the Q. All the F's kept their passenger pilots except of course the FTs and F2s. Which didn't have the passenger pilot when they were built. [Non-text port; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-02/msg00323.html (6,696 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]