Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+9913\s+Silver\s+Wings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+9913\s+Silver\s+Wings\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] 9913 Silver Wings (score: 1): Author: Gordon Smith <kc2bw@w...>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:27:03 -0500; Marshall...Take a closer look at the pictures again. They are two different locos! Pg. 63 is indeed a Ph I and surely not the 9913. It has the wide pilot buffer. The one on pg 115 could indeed be 991; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00409.html (10,931 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] 9913 Silver Wings (score: 1): Author: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:00:51 -0600; Good point . . . and I didn't even notice, because the coupler doors had been changed. Using a magnifier to the point where the halftone dots go berzerk, it looks like the p.63 nameboard is probably; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00410.html (10,493 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] 9913 Silver Wings (score: 1): Author: Gordon Smith <kc2bw@w...>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:35:06 -0500; OK...I found proof of phase...Bulletin 10 page 13 and C&S Southern Division by Fulcomer pg 36 and 39 shows C&S 9954, ex Q 9913. Good views of roof details. A ph II for sure. Gordon -- To reply take t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00439.html (10,993 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] 9913 Silver Wings (score: 1): Author: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:44:43 -0600; Thank you, Gordon! I don't have either quoted source, but I trust you - and feel very relieved <smiles> Marshall; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00443.html (9,885 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]