- 1. [CBQ] CB&Q vs Baldwin thru 1865 (score: 1)
- Author: "Rory" <rodroy@qwest.net>
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:02:17 -0800
- Hi All; I wonder if any of you locomotive historians might be able to shed some light on the following. Based on what information I presently have the following seems to be true. The CB&Q and all of
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-11/msg00021.html (9,728 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] Hannibal & St Joseph, Locomotives (score: 1)
- Author: "sarsfield01" <rodroy@qwest.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:51:40 -0600
- Hi All; I'm new to this group having just been directed to you. I have a great interest in the early years of railroading, and the locomotive rosters of the CB&Q and associate lines. I am trying to f
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-10/msg00102.html (9,127 bytes)
- 3. [CBQ] RE: Hannibal & St Joseph, Locomotives (score: 1)
- Author: "Rory" <rodroy@qwest.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 03:51:17 -0700
- Hi Rupert; Thank you for having responded to my post, and the welcome. I'll drop you a note offline. Cheers, Rory [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~-->
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-10/msg00120.html (8,223 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu