- 1. [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
- Author: "Patrick P" <dblp1@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:55:01 -0600
- The differences of opinons between the various railroads caused lots of minor problems with verious mergers. Without going back into my files, I can't tell you which was which for sure, but when Penn
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00025.html (21,450 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1)
- Author: "Patrick P" <dblp1@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:55:01 -0600
- Tom, I doubt that the UP was having units delivered to Chicago for tax purposes. I know that both the Q and the ATSF had units formally delivered in Iowa (West Quincy and Shopton/Fort Madison) to avo
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00063.html (12,731 bytes)
- 3. [CBQ] Re: Chicago transfers (score: 1)
- Author: "Patrick P" <dblp1@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:55:01 -0600
- I know that a repeated concern by the US DOT and the NTSB for years and years has been the lack of standarization. The oldest example I can think of is the Accident Investigation of an IC/BRC collisi
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00064.html (11,726 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Student Trips (score: 1)
- Author: "dblp1@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 26 May 2014 05:26:40 -0700
- A good friend of mine did that exact student trip sometime in the early 60's. I only recall him talking about it once. . . but at the end he said: "I marked off the Q and never went back. The next Mo
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00168.html (11,432 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu