Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RWA325@aol.com: 138 ]

Total 138 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Barriger Photos, CONSOLIDATED INDEX (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:34:50 -0500 (EST)
In case this might be helpful starting place. Combines all that have been posted to date. Bob Arthur Subj: [CBQ] CB&Q Barringer Photos, Consolidated Index 70 - Halstead St looking east in Chgo. Frt h
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00133.html (17,858 bytes)

82. Re: [CBQ] Re: compatibility of engines (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:36:41 -0500 (EST)
Let me see if I can throw some light on this common misconception about different Hp locos MU'd together. 1. Think of a man pulling a heavy wagon with a rope. The wagon is just a little too heavy fo
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00140.html (11,709 bytes)

83. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Barriger Photos, CONSOLIDATED INDEX (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:45:45 -0500 (EST)
Thanks Rich, I've added it to my list, as others may have also. I'll keep mine updated as info comes in and gladly send a copy to the email address of anyone who might want it. Bob Arthur Bob, No. 94
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00142.html (12,194 bytes)

84. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Barriger Photos, CONSOLIDATED INDEX (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:45:53 -0500 (EST)
Thanks, Rich. I have added it to my list, as others may be doing to their copies. If anyone wants a copy of my list (which I'll keep updated as info comes in), I'll gladly send to their email address
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00143.html (12,098 bytes)

85. [CBQ] Oops! (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:48:45 -0500 (EST)
Sorry for the double send. I thought I'd lost the first one and when I sent the second one, they both went. Gremlins! Poultergeists! Bob In a message dated 2/17/2014 1:45:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Tim
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00144.html (9,146 bytes)

86. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Barriger Photos, CONSOLIDATED INDEX (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:39:22 -0500 (EST)
Jan, et al: Sure been trying! As of the latest email posted -- see attachment In a message dated 2/18/2014 6:43:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, j.kohl@wildblue.net writes: Hey, Bob...have you been kee
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00192.html (14,362 bytes)

87. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Barriger Photos, CONSOLIDATED INDEX (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:23:50 -0500 (EST)
Correction made. Thank you. I noticed and corrected other errors that I doing "copy & paste." Bob A In a message dated 2/18/2014 9:05:50 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, rgortowski@aol.com writes: Bob, On
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00204.html (10,786 bytes)

88. Re: [CBQ] First Train Through Big Horn Basin (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:20:07 -0500 (EST)
Louis, The CB&Q didn't reach Kirby (between Worland and Thermopolis) until 1907, and Thermopolis in 1909. They didn't get thru the Wind River Canyon until 1913, finally connecting with the C&S in 191
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00205.html (13,517 bytes)

89. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Barriger Photos, CONSOLIDATED INDEX - More additions (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 21:30:44 -0500 (EST)
same when I photographed it six years ago. Bob Arthur In a message dated 2/19/2014 4:24:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, tcatkins@gmail.com writes: By the way, if #387 is in Thermop, then so is 386, w
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00257.html (11,757 bytes)

90. Re: [CBQ] Barriger Collection Photo Location List [1 Attachment] (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:42:01 -0500 (EST)
Randy, The MS-Word list is attached. Someone else started a spreadsheet version. Bob Arthur In a message dated 2/26/2014 1:30:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, milepost206@mchsi.com writes: I missed the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00365.html (10,091 bytes)

91. Re: [CBQ] Pre-1900 CB&Q Chicago Divison Photographs (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:27:30 -0500 (EST)
Interesting! I wonder if No. 9 retained the inside drive in the 1864-65 rebuild. Or was the photo taken after the rebuild? Bob Arthur In a message dated 2/28/2014 12:27:32 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00393.html (13,377 bytes)

92. Re: [CBQ] New Christmas trains (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 13:31:49 -0500 (EST)
Sounds good to me. What ever works best for you is "the name of the game." I have waaay too much HO stuff! The heaviest concentration is the BN's pre-merger components, but also a lot of NYC and PRR,
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00001.html (13,584 bytes)

93. Re: [CBQ] New Christmas trains (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 15:29:04 -0500 (EST)
My "NYC turf" was the "Big-4" territory of Springfield and Dayton Ohio. Unfortunately, all my BN and pre-BN equipment are still in many boxes, pending operational status of the new layout. I hope you
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00004.html (15,183 bytes)

94. Re: [CBQ] New CZ Mystery Book (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 15:09:19 -0500 (EST)
Bill, Thanks for the review! I'm anxious to get started on my copy, softbound from Amazon.com, just received yesterday. Bob Arthur In a message dated 1/5/2014 2:04:09 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, wsco
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00012.html (12,960 bytes)

95. Re: [CBQ] Re: 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:45:36 -0500 (EST)
mailto:qutlx1@aol.com?subject=Re: 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota "Leo" leophillipp Mon Jan 6, 2014 8:28 pm (PST) . Posted by: Would this likely have happened pre-BNSF? Bob Arthur In a message d
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00023.html (20,683 bytes)

96. Re: [CBQ] Re: Track oiling (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:45:22 -0500 (EST)
Were the motor cars even capable of being "speedy"? Bob Arthur In a message dated 1/12/2014 10:14:40 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, dhartman@mchsi.com writes: To echo from a former in the Operating Depa
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00084.html (13,042 bytes)

97. Re: [CBQ] Re: Track oiling (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:51:38 -0500 (EST)
Please disregard my question. Bob In a message dated 1/13/2014 11:49:52 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, wohrnell@kc.rr.com writes: Were the motor cars even capable of being "speedy" ? Bob Arthur Mr. Arth
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00108.html (13,230 bytes)

98. Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 5767 (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:10:06 -0500 (EST)
Re: Track oiling [1 Attachment] 1a Re: Track oiling [1 Attachment] 1b Re: Track oiling [2 Attachments] 1c Re: Track oiling [2 Attachments] 1d Re: Track oiling "Douglas Harding" hardingdouglas "John D
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00116.html (44,288 bytes)

99. Re: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:54:26 -0500 (EST)
I've been a member of the model railroading and railfan communities for fifty years and have never worked for a railroad. I have no problem with being identified with and/or labeled as a member of th
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00140.html (14,965 bytes)

100. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oiling Track (score: 1)
Author: RWA325@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:07:46 -0500 (EST)
Was uric acid and ammonia from animal urine considered to be detrimental to physical plant on heavy livestock routes? Re: Salt was the problem...not cow "droppings" Bob Arthur __._,_.___ Change setti
/archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00171.html (11,801 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu