Mail Archive Search: <+from:Edwardsutorik@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Edwardsutorik@aol.com: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. [CBQ] Re: Q Es elephant style (score: 1): Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 12 Jan 2018 05:05:27 +0000; So then from Chicago all E's would be facing "outward" because of suburban service. That DOES imply that the units were more mixed and matched than if they were assigned to particular trains. Because; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00072.html (12,787 bytes)
22. Re: [CBQ] Elephant Style Es (score: 1): Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 12 Jan 2018 21:08:14 +0000; "...combining Zephyrs out of Chicago..." That sounds interesting. Which trains were those, and where did they split? That Menk thing. It's been noted by others. I'd surely like to see documentation o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00076.html (14,813 bytes)
23. Re: [CBQ] Elephant Style Es (score: 1): Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 12 Jan 2018 21:22:01 +0000; __._,_.___ Posted by: Edwardsutorik@aol.com Visit Your Group New Members 1 Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use __,_._,___; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00077.html (15,572 bytes)
24. Re: [CBQ] Elephant Style Es (score: 1): Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 13 Jan 2018 00:06:51 +0000; The KCZ and NZ were split at Galesburg. May we assume that the loco consist was split at that point? Seems likely. For the other trains, I don't believe they ever split. So there would be no related; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00087.html (15,564 bytes)
25. [CBQ] Re: Elephant Style Es (score: 1): Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 13 Jan 2018 05:36:46 +0000; Walter, I'd like to see that evidence. Of course, there's a difference between it happening occasionally and happening regularly, perhaps by policy. Thanks for the story. One has to work with what on; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00091.html (14,143 bytes)
26. Re: [CBQ] Re: Elephant Style Es (score: 1): Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 13 Jan 2018 17:53:40 +0000; __._,_.___ Posted by: Edwardsutorik@aol.com Visit Your Group New Members 1 Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use __,_._,___; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00098.html (15,227 bytes)
27. [CBQ] Re: Elephant Style Es (score: 1): Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 13 Jan 2018 20:44:50 +0000; Thank you, Lenny Ed Edward Sutorik __._,_.___ Posted by: Edwardsutorik@aol.com Visit Your Group New Members 1 Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use __,_._,___; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00115.html (14,260 bytes)
28. Re: [CBQ] Re: Elephant Style Es (score: 1): Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 16 Jan 2018 20:50:43 +0000; Reporting back from the Santa Fe Yahoo group: It appears that adding a frontwards A to passenger trains was not commonly done. 14 of 89 samples, in one case. And WHY it was done that way in those 14; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00142.html (12,200 bytes)
29. Re: [CBQ] Elephant style E's (score: 1): Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 25 Jan 2018 00:31:54 +0000; Apparently, there used to be sanding hoses, but that control function went up to the MU electrical cable. And the sanding hoses were deleted. I don't have a clue when that happened. I think there wer; /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00218.html (12,757 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]