BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder?

To: CBQ@groups.io
Subject: Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder?
From: "james miller" <jimbro67@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 16:43:21 -0500
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@groups.io
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1631828611; bh=BmiCbHECa+TfCbU9z0OE4ZHahNn1Izj1trTh0f+B8ks=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=kEMjXpJcVhPzVQjwGosaUQ7LNw3SIUJ6a/R132mn5QgyfMeGwqhRgUm2rJSvuQgSYQw ubu9akpy8+mIp1YGGbyU50O9KhiimzKhbKq/qngXmLLSDGgVwXT77DKqQoIElD1QtSTuF /LNtrICMR6jQ23bvTgh8yyYMUtONVuGW5As=
In-reply-to: <1c435bc1-fda8-e7a4-587e-3d8d718d8656@davidstreeter.net>
List-help: <mailto:CBQ+help@groups.io>
List-id: <CBQ.groups.io>
List-subscribe: <mailto:CBQ+subscribe@groups.io>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ+unsubscribe@groups.io>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
References: <1c435bc1-fda8-e7a4-587e-3d8d718d8656@davidstreeter.net>
Reply-to: CBQ@groups.io
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
Q only handled local mail on the Blackhawk. Nothing on the Builder.

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021, 4:12 PM little-q@att.net <trains@davidstreeter.net> wrote:
Is there a readily available, reasonably accurate HO scale Q RPO that
would be appropriate for the Chicago - St. Paul leg of the Empire
Builder in the 1955-60 era? I just learned that the GN's RPO didn't go
to Chicago, so I need a Q car if I run the train with my Q E units.
Also, did the Q add its own storage mail baggage car ahead of its RPO?
The GNRHS reference sheet doesn't mention it, but I thought I'd ask. If
so, would a shadow-lined Havelock be appropriate?

--
David Streeter






_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#62558) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>