Re: [CBQ] Vintage CB&Q video...

["spsalso via Groups.Io" <Edwardsutorik=aol.com@groups.io>]

I can see some sort of "thing" on the side of the diaphragm I am describing.  It sort of looks like a class-light housing, though that would not be what it was.  That is why I think there IS a diaphragm (or "canvas cover").  If you look at the shadow in the void between the A and B, you will see that it doesn't repeat for the B-B connection.  There IS no shadow.  Thus no void.

I believe there were drawbars between the A and B's.  And couplers between the B's.  This was not necessary, as GN had 4 unit sets of FT's both with and without such couplers.  But I am trying to account both for the much wider gap and the diaphragm/canvas cover.


Ed

Edward Sutorik

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#55271) | Reply To Group | Mute This Topic | New Topic

Change Your Subscription
Group Home
Contact Group Owner
Terms Of Service
Unsubscribe From This Group

_._,_._,_