Re: [CBQ] Re: Elephant Style Es

["Don Brown dbrown02@rochester.rr.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>]

Obviously a typo, I meant"...which could MU at both ends...."

On 1/22/2018 1:38 PM, Don Brown dbrown02@rochester.rr.com [CBQ] wrote:

 

2 A units back to back would still be 2 units.  He asked about MORE than 2 units.  Since the discussion is about A units before MU was added to the front (nose) end, the only ways would be to add something which could MY at both ends (theoretically not just an E5B) OR if you have nothing but A units, a second engineer could presumably operate one of the trailing units. 

On 1/22/2018 1:23 PM, Dale Grice dfgrice@gmail.com [CBQ] wrote:

 

Or 2 A units back to back.

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Charlie cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

All
Does all this mean that prior to 1953-55 the only possible way to have more than two E units powering a train would be by using an E5B in the laship?
Charlie Vlk

__._,_.___

---

Posted by: Don Brown <dbrown02@rochester.rr.com>

---

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___