BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CBQ EA early Zephyr Oriental/KMT locomotive model . Was:: [CBQ] Earl

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: CBQ EA early Zephyr Oriental/KMT locomotive model . Was:: [CBQ] Early Zephyrs, placement of god ZEPHYRUS graphic.
From: "rgortowski@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:44:53 -0500
Authentication-results: mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=aol.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=mx.aol.com; dkim=pass (ok)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1487195097; bh=MdTvirwQls11V26KHY2cUYBcQYUB/vrSDW267vbR7hk=; h=To:In-Reply-To:References:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=CVB8W1yisvLXZBSdAE7l/YcNhou056if2x5zBNThYsRa5zLPQoqpgJSq4Gsr99ClNLHIwtVQIFsZaOAQrbW0PYJGT6cows+GUn7xRW7db8RrmSKTbs0eIabiI2mSP9WamGB77LidRTFYWACmlZvNnFLHUwZyICxyPV8DgRGyd5I=
In-reply-to: <o82hem+1bjas7m@YahooGroups.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <o82hem+1bjas7m@YahooGroups.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


Denny,

I agree the "shovelnose" engines were called EA's and used the 201 Winton engines, but the E-5's had two 1000 hp 12 cylinder 567 engines.  I got to stand between them while riding the Silver Pilot out at Union - fantastic!

Rich G


-----Original Message-----
From: danspachmd@gmail.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wed, Feb 15, 2017 3:33 pm
Subject: Re: CBQ EA early Zephyr Oriental/KMT locomotive model . Was:: [CBQ] Early Zephyrs, placement of god ZEPHYRUS graphic.

 
According to Hol Wagner, the engines were 900 hp 201A, the Winton numbering system. Whether or not they were eventually replaced with 567s, I do not know but would not be surprised. 

I will also demur on the EA.  These were known at the time and have been numerously most authoritatively identified as EAs, even as  the quite different B&0s had the same designation. The E referred to Eighteen Hundred, and the production was A.  Confusing,  yes; but that is the way it was when all these locomotives in the primordial soup of diesel-dom were custom made.

Denny


__._,_.___

Posted by: rgortowski@aol.com



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>