To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: CBQ EA early Zephyr Oriental/KMT locomotive model . Was:: [CBQ] Early Zephyrs, placement of god ZEPHYRUS graphic. |
From: | "rgortowski@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:44:53 -0500 |
Authentication-results: | mta1005.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=aol.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=mx.aol.com; dkim=pass (ok) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1487195097; bh=MdTvirwQls11V26KHY2cUYBcQYUB/vrSDW267vbR7hk=; h=To:In-Reply-To:References:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=CVB8W1yisvLXZBSdAE7l/YcNhou056if2x5zBNThYsRa5zLPQoqpgJSq4Gsr99ClNLHIwtVQIFsZaOAQrbW0PYJGT6cows+GUn7xRW7db8RrmSKTbs0eIabiI2mSP9WamGB77LidRTFYWACmlZvNnFLHUwZyICxyPV8DgRGyd5I= |
In-reply-to: | <o82hem+1bjas7m@YahooGroups.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <o82hem+1bjas7m@YahooGroups.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Denny,
I agree the "shovelnose" engines were called EA's and used the 201 Winton engines, but the E-5's had two 1000 hp 12 cylinder 567 engines. I got to stand between them while riding the Silver Pilot out at Union - fantastic!
Rich G
-----Original Message-----
From: danspachmd@gmail.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wed, Feb 15, 2017 3:33 pm Subject: Re: CBQ EA early Zephyr Oriental/KMT locomotive model . Was:: [CBQ] Early Zephyrs, placement of god ZEPHYRUS graphic. According to Hol Wagner, the engines were 900 hp 201A, the Winton numbering system. Whether or not they were eventually replaced with 567s, I do not know but would not be surprised.
I will also demur on the EA. These were known at the time and have been numerously most authoritatively identified as EAs, even as the quite different B&0s had the same designation. The E referred to Eighteen Hundred, and the production was A. Confusing, yes; but that is the way it was when all these locomotives in the primordial soup of diesel-dom were custom made.
Denny
__._,_.___ Posted by: rgortowski@aol.com __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: CBQ EA early Zephyr Oriental/KMT locomotive model . Was:: [CBQ] Early Zephyrs, placement of god ZEPHYRUS graphic., danspachmd@gmail.com [CBQ] |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: CBQ EA early Zephyr Oriental/KMT locomotive model . Was:: [CBQ] Early Zephyrs, placement of god ZEPHYRUS graphic. [1 Attachment], BRIAN PAUL EHNI bpehni@gmail.com [CBQ] |
Previous by Thread: | Re: CBQ EA early Zephyr Oriental/KMT locomotive model . Was:: [CBQ] Early Zephyrs, placement of god ZEPHYRUS graphic., danspachmd@gmail.com [CBQ] |
Next by Thread: | Re: CBQ EA early Zephyr Oriental/KMT locomotive model . Was:: [CBQ] Early Zephyrs, placement of god ZEPHYRUS graphic. [1 Attachment], BRIAN PAUL EHNI bpehni@gmail.com [CBQ] |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |