BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam?

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam?
From: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:18:47 +1300
Authentication-results: mta1004.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=ihug.co.nz; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=ihug.co.nz; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1444011531; bh=TQmc2CzQub8LiwswA0C7Ps/eGfp++Vo3Kv4s7cufO5I=; h=To:References:In-Reply-To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=htlYBwN6v4tyFiDUvIsq1rU3jmp0AGI0b+r1Ju+Fa/XGvGpxH+Y88sk825J7Bqn9Ru6C0W7nxjvgnD2c+MS4ZQ1y/gejRp19Tvs3dHlH6P40gqsZdLcU4pK8zMRRDiXIwMuNbSHx1+ryvchorPlZ14416tLVaDX1Ko2caZV2sKw=
In-reply-to: <005e01d0ff03$42879170$c796b450$@net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <muscab+13nl0t3@YahooGroups.com> <005e01d0ff03$42879170$c796b450$@net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Thread-index: AdD++3IzijvM1jf+QHKkXa6Eb4vWSQABldZAAARmvyA=


Mike

Couple of random thoughts re. your 2-8-4 – does it have to have a Burlington Herald on the side? What about a lease or a demonstrator?  Can anyone prove that such events didn’t happen
J

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ

 


Does anybody know if there were ever any proposed CB&Q steam but never built or diesel for that matter?  I'm guessing that the "Q" must have been in good shape motive-wise thru the 1930s and going into World War II because the only additions to the roster were additional O5s in what.. 1940?  Burlington had a huge number of 2-8-2s and I wonder if that's why no true freight power was bought after the 2-10-4s of 1927.  The war didn't catch the "Q" short motive-power and I guess with the addition of the FTs and E5s they must have been in good shape.

I'd like to know if there might have been a hint of additional steam power being purchased during the war.  I'm trying to find a reason to have a "Q" 2-8-4 that might have been based somewhat in fact.  I may just do it anyway since I like NKP 2-8-4s a lot.  I've never seen or read anything about the "Q" having any shortages of motive-power or considering additional purchases.  If the "Q" would have been forced to buy motive power during the war they may not have been allowed to use their own designs like the Milwaukee (S3 4-8-4s).  Would they have chosen to buy an engine like the S3 or a Lima NKP style 2-8-4?




__._,_.___

Posted by: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>