To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] General Mills |
From: | "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
Date: | Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:24:02 -0400 |
Authentication-results: | mta1005.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=aol.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=mx.aol.com; dkim=pass (ok) |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1439303045; bh=/G05qO2E29Uk/IYLZ1SVhX0PJyyX3hnLAUSf0pxOLSE=; h=To:In-Reply-To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=VNLo/h7Q9BP5T0adiGk4xCQckX0WvuMfY3EAJ7Cj0iJJ7OmKfAQpFGGSqeHBQWKwQaaks38/DavEwTgcqIFu8PcduVwrvrNd4705Qfb99w2foPwFET1k4Kb4ljNTL6/MjnKaIj3+YjALK522ixbLjEvdLDHwZ2ixynbr8pgdSe8= |
In-reply-to: | <34F8C031-EB20-43B1-B1A1-E5CD4A09AAC2@aol.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Leo Dave et...There's an interesting matter of terms and spelling involved here and although it makes no difference to the subject or the story...as most of my stuff doesn't here it is.
In the case of damaged goods which I dealt with for almost 8 years there was a term used for going through damaged cases of goods and pulling out the undamaged cans or sacks and putting them back into a new box or sack and getting that "new" package back "into stock". Thus the carrier only paid for the cans or sacks which were actually damaged plus the labor to do the job. This process was known as RECOOPERING....in contrast to your use of the term RECOUPERING which means just recovering what is left.
The term RECOOPERING comes from an old term "COOPERER" A COOPERER was a maker of barrels or boxes. Thus RECOOPERING is the process of getting the stuff back into new containers in contrast to the term RECOUPER which just means recovering whatever you can.
Once again this bit of trivia is provided for all members of this group at no charge and with full knowledge of the provider that...."this guy has too much time on his hands"...I really don't but this is sol much fun that I just can't help myself.
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 10, 2015 7:00 pm Subject: Re: [CBQ] General Mills
Dave,
That's what the recoup was, In house damaged stuff,dropped,etc. when a case gets dropped probably 70-80% of the boxes are just fine but no longer in the case. I think General Mills came up with the $2/bag recoup so as to avoid pilferage that might have went on at other customers plants.
And just for clarification, this was back in the paper bag days and rest assured a box or two,three were stacked over and above the top edge of the bag. Quite a balancing act getting on the way car or GP-7 !
I don't recall any switching crew pilferage at West Chicago. For $2 you had all the product you needed. If you were on the job regular you could go into the resale business. See Ed De Rouins book on the Pennsy in Chicago and The Cambells soup plant !
Ps- same stuff goes on today at all kinds of warehouses but it's with trucks.
Leo
Sent from my iPad On Aug 10, 2015, at 6:32 PM, David Weber dave@cimmarondesign.com [CBQ] < CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
__._,_.___ Posted by: jpslhedgpeth@aol.com __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CBQ] Sheridan, IL Bridge, marvigj29@yahoo.com [CBQ] |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] General Mills, qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] General Mills, qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] General Mills, qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ] |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |