I think we're talking about two different pictures. When I said they might be
on loan, I was referring to the Kanas WPA picture where the ditcher cars were
all together. You are talking about the Ball Engine ad.
On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 5:27 PM, Jan Kohl <j.kohl@wildblue.net> wrote:
Could have been loaned/rented to another railroad for some work...
Cheers!
Jan Kohl
castlegraphics.com
On 3/12/2014 8:14 AM, Hol Wagner wrote:
>
>The location of this view is troublesome, as it is identified as being in
>Cherokee County, Kan., in May 1936. But Cherokee is the southeasternmost
>county in Kansas and the Q did not have trackage anywhere near there.
>Presumably the photographer mislabeled the view.
>
>Hol
>
>
>
>________________________________
>To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
>From: gamlenz@ihug.co.nz
>Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:24:15 +1300
>Subject: RE: [CBQ] Q ditcher
>
>
>John
>
>Yes I agree. Seeing three and a half of
the six ditchers in the one photo
suggested that all six might be present
(or why else would they have at least
four together). The flat cars with
consecutive numbers had rails along
them in a similar manner to the advert
photos suggesting that they were the
ones allocated to each of the ditchers
and, with so many together, I thought the
photo might have been taken at the time
the Burlington bought them. My
copy of the photo came from the original
LOC collection and doesn’t have
the subscription shown in the Shorpy copy,
so I was unaware of the date. None
of the photos used in the advert, calendar
or UK website show the number of the
flat car bearing 260 but presumably it was
in the company service numbering
series.
>
>Rupert Gamlen
>Auckland NZ
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>From:CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John D.
>Mitchell, Jr.
>Sent: Wednesday, 12 March 2014 4:24 p.m.
>To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [CBQ] Q ditcher
>
>
>
>
>
>Rupert
>I don't believe the photo is a delivery photo. This is for three reasons.
>First the picture is a WPA photograph, made during the Depression years in the
>30's many years after they were delivered. Second, as delivered, they were
>painted white and in the picture they are black and lastly, they are on flat
>cars in the company service number series.
>
>On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 9:08 PM, Rupert & Maureen mailto:gamlenz@ihug.co.nz
>wrote:
>
>Going back through my e-mails, I see that Ken Martin should be credited with
>finding one of the
adverts I referred
to.
>
>There is a similar
photo to the second
advert showing the
dump car in the
>April 2011 calendar
from Mile Post 206
Publishing except
that, once again,
>it is a much better
picture than the
magazine one. And
the way car in the
>photo is apparently
14252.
>
>Rupert Gamlen
>Auckland NZ
>
>
>
>
|