To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Pre-1900 CB&Q Chicago Divison Photographs |
From: | RWA325@aol.com |
Date: | Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:30:41 -0500 (EST) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1393806642; bh=+JjY6mlA5hl4eRL/Tyd4zf+jJo3AdOTl8XU6ikvbo3w=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Full-name:Message-ID:To:X-Mailer:x-aol-global-disposition:x-aol-sid:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=M4y5BVuHv4m1Y1UbsVIPsHXc2PoMtWo7nwHLfCVa7p5cD3qevRd9HqmaHEONByhaCVFaFRqkwj0LdIITPAgsWtfEfO6hY6QVFbORlSEuUc99X3XMdlp4usLeNrSn7iGicjvcKjS5qUx+Y6xR9QdPXuMJseRySdaia1yf5gZCYi4= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=M9olHqiELBdCe28lxZG7fyqKQuWKy8VdM3Vv4N6QpMpz19s4GBl+BbQg0Bnz8AfKtGhqKyhwNW8DW+9J5deX72ixT5zIBTrZlW9wZEY/wTFujITRdt1jDw+954hzwpo4aXmpPrWosB1RQnqA5WFgXjhUj4NC1tWfVhYm3HJcY+E=; |
Full-name: | RWA325 |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Thanks, Louis. That tender puts me in mind of Walther's "Oscar" and "Piker" cars. ;-) Bob Arthur Princeton, NC In a message dated 3/2/2014 4:07:43 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, LZadnichek@aol.com writes: March 2, 2014 Bob - I do not know (doubtful any records exist, either), but I'd speculate that since inside-connection was considered archaic in US steam locomotive design by that time, No. 9 was converted to conventional outside-connection. It almost certainly would've received a standard full size tender, too. Louis Zadnichek II Fairhope, AL In a message dated 2/28/2014 10:27:39 P.M. Central Standard Time, RWA325@aol.com writes: Interesting! I wonder if No. 9 retained the inside drive in the 1864-65 rebuild. Or was the photo taken after the rebuild? Bob Arthur |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Barriger Photos Photo IDs, sartherdj@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Barriger Photos Photo IDs, Noel Crawford |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Pre-1900 CB&Q Chicago Divison Photographs, LZadnichek |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Re: Marty Bernard Photos, William Barber |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |