To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 5767 |
From: | Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com |
Date: | Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:29:39 -0500 (EST) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1389648580; bh=bhXayppGJzz/bc6opyTA+Psf0lhFlH0xO30/T+9OYqA=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:References:To:In-Reply-To:X-MB-Message-Source:X-MB-Message-Type:X-Mailer:X-Received:Message-Id:x-aol-global-disposition:x-aol-sid:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=OSGRvvdAdL5XWoqgQ+hYCa8i73HuXUxz60ZhA7Sw34dnPMOxt/zlJIZYZQ7vYny2mN+JkMjqrtS08py6JSOrVahI0bwnci/SN1DY/UpIrQEUOKKr3cvCq7xP4g80WMdoEmpcsxXv+9ss2/wmy2mYBfomCL8Ph2eM3DDYBPog1vQ= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=o83Fc8ozv0ROPkfrV4zX+eb28NQfaPQlGZv3Oub4D7KimwSPhxapuyeLh9WPwRy8Ys87JmizkyiiJE2wAjTYNNaJ31C2K17DhHZwwPQrLaAloJZvtt8LGphWwW//Fhl8PphVOe6KY4qQ53qVR18JXbIxI3PH9Hc1dBjDl93Bs5c=; |
In-reply-to: | <52715F06-6BA3-4C16-B909-5E7E10986125@gmail.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <1389588323.692.43789.m6@yahoogroups.com> <52715F06-6BA3-4C16-B909-5E7E10986125@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Bill et al I think that Hol has adequately handled the matter of differentiation between what you called "put put" cars and the "gas electric" PMC's No one in the railroad industry would have confused the two different machines both referred to as "motor cars" As one not skilled in the art of interpretation or exegesis, but who is somewhat familiar with the principles thereof I would be familiar with the principle that says.."Context determines meaning.
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Mon, Jan 13, 2014 10:13 am Subject: Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 5767 Pete and John,
While motor car may have been the official name, these vehicle had all sorts of nick names, some not so gracious, used by real railroads. Among them were putt-putt, track-maintenance car, crew car, jigger, trike, quad, trolley or inspection car. I personally know that some Q railroaders around Chicago called them putt putts.
Now, if you call those machines motor cars, what do you call a gas electric car such as no. 9844 or 9845? Those were also called motor cars as well as doodlebugs, etc.
It's just semantics and local vernacular. Until the railfans coined it, I never heard of a diesel locomotive consist referred to as a lash up and I worked many years for a company that built some of them.
Bill Barber
Gravois Mills, MO
On Jan 12, 2014, at 10:45 PM, CBQ@yahoogroups.com wrote:
__._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Digest Number 5767, mdecker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 5767, William Jackson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 5767, RWA325 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 5767, Duncan Cameron |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |