Re: [CBQ] Was 'Attachments' now depot roofs

To:	CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject:	Re: [CBQ] Was 'Attachments' now depot roofs
From:	Sam Cook <trains@sjcook.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:53:44 -0600
Authentication-results:	pacmmta52 smtp.user=sjcook3266@windstream.net; auth=pass (PLAIN)
Delivered-to:	unknown
Delivered-to:	archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to:	mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1360295629; bh=sMORiVHrqH48OtoZttkjHIq8JOA9B0ORdjNcMl3FXI0=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-WS-COS:X-Cloudmark-Category:X-Cloudmark-Analysis:X-Cloudmark-Score:Authentication-Results:X-Received:Message-ID:User-Agent:To:References:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=I3xxqb/9gBYtXa4L/xorkuRtEzK4Tecs9pp+KY3MvQVuMdniYnpamgUMENXsxw+PjcuviLNKKZ3UZgYX494eT7ziof72dWBC/P1jeTu/Op0n8QgASGoJHTHP3YNfVB/Nia0lf681erBZUVftsobLtaW233Gi7RcXgbKbTSCwHUs=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=LQNJGVFr3ri9hKLUfsyFvK9QmmZS5ehiyNx8VxW1cffrFZpRxqvmbKtpS98xi97TnFHutDpJeq5m2lDhJ7bIqOtC5ZnyUMMGhmds7YaBySYFyK3MQzlmIV953KhzMeGGuoA1UgNG1p1Ejm0b3131wJmj5+6TmlsMhWCh39lP7P4=;
In-reply-to:	<003e01ce05ae$1f6f9da0$5e4ed8e0$@com>
List-id:	<CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe:	<mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list:	list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References:	<003101ce0566$4faffde0$ef0ff9a0$@iowacentralrr.org> <003e01ce05ae$1f6f9da0$5e4ed8e0$@com>
Reply-to:	CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender:	CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15.2

 From my collection:
http://sjcook.com/trains/colerich/cole0002.jpg

Sam Cook, Milan, MO
===================

Nolen Null wrote:
>
>
> List,
>
> Doug's photo of Batavia IA brought an interesting question to mind:  Why were 
> some depot roofs built with an "upward" curve at the bottom?  Seems  to me 
> that it would make
> construction more difficult and expensive.
>
> Nolen Null
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[CBQ] Attachments [1 Attachment], Douglas Harding [CBQ] Was 'Attachments' now depot roofs, Nolen Null Re: [CBQ] Was 'Attachments' now depot roofs, Sam Cook <= RE: [CBQ] Was 'Attachments' now depot roofs, Charlie Vlk

Previous by Date:	[CBQ] Was 'Attachments' now depot roofs, Nolen Null
Next by Date:	[CBQ] Re: Z scale Whale Belly, dr strangelove
Previous by Thread:	[CBQ] Was 'Attachments' now depot roofs, Nolen Null
Next by Thread:	RE: [CBQ] Was 'Attachments' now depot roofs, Charlie Vlk
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]