To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology |
From: | Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com |
Date: | Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:26:55 -0500 (EST) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echo; t=1355509618; bh=D7nxon13hHSoB33zk3DmntAOz6YBYNV17TiBwltYG9I=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:References:To:In-Reply-To:X-MB-Message-Source:X-MB-Message-Type:X-Mailer:X-Received:Message-Id:x-aol-global-disposition:X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE:X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:x-aol-sid:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=SGHjE52lFE4I5aXmjTj1LUtBFhUUZWlToWVp8uyGAnrYiH0D2HsfH/BCl/DkE22oPafTDi5vvS2q23QPqGbXopJhfIibaI8ELrScyZBb+oYPYkNrtgzbtNO18KXGLOv8oM4oUsk/MZ9Tv+iLQqv1I7kZwgoA8CQF4CA/oxZ1Iwg= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echo; d=yahoogroups.com; b=HME6UhrNJRJeSxlKuDZEJWvSmDJAq7HVQbTSucYaPULxa5NaK3t3iQv1rf45RIlpiCHVuyjimWX5jEyWyNN4AG5KNZvfoZWqgs8nFWsx7URMy7aEanOX/dhdWD9rUXDTfW8JXa/FnHk84T4CU88dB3tT9hAVWulgrAVzl/8tD/I=; |
In-reply-to: | <1355502882.72662.YahooMailClassic@web162504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <1355502882.72662.YahooMailClassic@web162504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
John et al
Here is another "distinctive" that has never been adequately explained..(at least to me)...It's the matter of referring to an engine as the 1 SPOT 5 SPOT etc...On the RPL&N our second locomotive...(Baldwin saddle tank class of 1913) was always referred to as 2 SPOT...I've also seen this terminology used in old RAILROAD MAGAZINE stories written by REAL RAILROADERS...Was the term maybe used for single digit numbers to designate that "that's all the number there was". I never heard the term used to refer to any double or more series of numbers ie 2793 SPOT.
I ready to listen
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: John D. Mitchell, Jr. <cbqrr47@yahoo.com> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Fri, Dec 14, 2012 10:34 am Subject: Re: [CBQ] Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology
__._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Palace stock cars, archie hayden |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Palace stock cars, Charlie Vlk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology, John Sloan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology, John D. Mitchell, Jr. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |