BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0
From: "Larry Sallee" <lsallee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:35:55 -0000
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1346351757; bh=9tujn8TlgxsnwnPdFj2qt9ciflzhZ9b3bttWj/E4Ns4=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=Y8BQE1/LZdjNeOkfkcG1L2fXka9lsYcPFPemi07fGOO9lHDDiVnKYogaGihcK1oHK9raxGDmVrwKrX7TDWURpzNkZZGq2nZEXyeiaB/fcWUqspBC6SBnRDDBX85cNfBA
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=eDR/gtbx+IJnu6jvEICHwzTNaAZNRdGQ4WBNyguQPmKetHoDOfxL4gACp1Ko/ErXTklKHR4Yb3Q19SjZ9WNyQf8U0zLzeMuIV+lPxcBNUFA5KE+j+H/0y10VRcpHVp2D;
In-reply-to: <017601cd86da$18b4d870$4a1e8950$@net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82


Not the best view of the tenders you might want, but do these photos illustrate the difference in the coal bunkers you're discussing? Low . High .

Larry

--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@...> wrote:
>
> Bob-
>
> The 500-509 seem to have been delivered with the original full coal bunker
> USRA short tender. The coal bunkers on some of the engines were cut and
> moved inward retaining the partially curved top contour; on others and/or
> later square sheet versions were used. I don't have too many photos of
> the originals..some of the later engines had clear vision coal bunkers that
> extend past the top of the cab and, in contrast, some have very low tenders
> with fairly short clear vision bunkers.
>
> The NWSW view may show a C&NW tender; they had similar ones (not sure if
> they had the braces along the sides).
>
> Charlie Vlk
>
>
>
> From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Robert
> Bullermann
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:28 AM
> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0
>
>
>
>
>
> NSW used all kinds of combinations on tenders used on their ex CB&Q and
> later ex GTW 0-8-0's. In later years they used KCS tenders behind their GTW
> 0-8-0's.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: William Barber <mailto:clipperw@...
>
> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:19 AM
>
> Subject: [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0
>
>
>
>
>
> The Q had 10 original USRA 0-6-0 locomotives, numbered 500 - 509. I found a
> photo of no. 504 after it had been sold to Northwest Steel and Wire for
> scrap. They used it as one of their plant switchers for a while. In the
> photo, it has an unusual tender coal bunker which matches a Sunset O scale
> model that I recently purchased. It is not the standard USRA tender and it
> is not like other modified tenders on Q USRA 0-6-0s. Here is a link to the
> photo at NWS&W.
>
> http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/Locopicture.aspx?id=128711
>
> Does anyone know where I can find a photo of the same locomotive while it
> was in service on the Q? I would like to confirm that the tender, as shown
> at NWS&W, was also used by the Q so I can use the model as is.
>
> BTW, the photo in RR Photo Archives is, for some reason, for sale right now
> on EBay. It may be a copy.
>
> Bill Barber
> Gravois Mills, MO
>


__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>