To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0 |
From: | "Larry Sallee" <lsallee@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:35:55 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1346351757; bh=9tujn8TlgxsnwnPdFj2qt9ciflzhZ9b3bttWj/E4Ns4=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=Y8BQE1/LZdjNeOkfkcG1L2fXka9lsYcPFPemi07fGOO9lHDDiVnKYogaGihcK1oHK9raxGDmVrwKrX7TDWURpzNkZZGq2nZEXyeiaB/fcWUqspBC6SBnRDDBX85cNfBA |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=eDR/gtbx+IJnu6jvEICHwzTNaAZNRdGQ4WBNyguQPmKetHoDOfxL4gACp1Ko/ErXTklKHR4Yb3Q19SjZ9WNyQf8U0zLzeMuIV+lPxcBNUFA5KE+j+H/0y10VRcpHVp2D; |
In-reply-to: | <017601cd86da$18b4d870$4a1e8950$@net> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
Not the best view of the tenders you might want, but do these photos illustrate the difference in the coal bunkers you're discussing? Low . High . Larry --- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@...> wrote: > > Bob- > > The 500-509 seem to have been delivered with the original full coal bunker > USRA short tender. The coal bunkers on some of the engines were cut and > moved inward retaining the partially curved top contour; on others and/or > later square sheet versions were used. I don't have too many photos of > the originals..some of the later engines had clear vision coal bunkers that > extend past the top of the cab and, in contrast, some have very low tenders > with fairly short clear vision bunkers. > > The NWSW view may show a C&NW tender; they had similar ones (not sure if > they had the braces along the sides). > > Charlie Vlk > > > > From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Robert > Bullermann > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:28 AM > To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0 > > > > > > NSW used all kinds of combinations on tenders used on their ex CB&Q and > later ex GTW 0-8-0's. In later years they used KCS tenders behind their GTW > 0-8-0's. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: William Barber <mailto:clipperw@... > > To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:19 AM > > Subject: [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0 > > > > > > The Q had 10 original USRA 0-6-0 locomotives, numbered 500 - 509. I found a > photo of no. 504 after it had been sold to Northwest Steel and Wire for > scrap. They used it as one of their plant switchers for a while. In the > photo, it has an unusual tender coal bunker which matches a Sunset O scale > model that I recently purchased. It is not the standard USRA tender and it > is not like other modified tenders on Q USRA 0-6-0s. Here is a link to the > photo at NWS&W. > > http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/Locopicture.aspx?id=128711 > > Does anyone know where I can find a photo of the same locomotive while it > was in service on the Q? I would like to confirm that the tender, as shown > at NWS&W, was also used by the Q so I can use the model as is. > > BTW, the photo in RR Photo Archives is, for some reason, for sale right now > on EBay. It may be a copy. > > Bill Barber > Gravois Mills, MO > __._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0, Charlie Vlk |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0, Charlie Vlk |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0, Charlie Vlk |
Next by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Re: USRA 0-6-0, Charlie Vlk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |