BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Re: Cab Signals

To: "CBQ yahoo" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Cab Signals
From: dhartman@mchsi.com
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:21:29 +0000
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1345296020; bh=ce4rPwYpJhEHbRsXIIrWhcTHSer0A1A8Xq86r2lhqdc=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=P44jg81grUARJQXzOn/eiETDhuuAsvYjIAIOVTM9F00dZN+YYoISnjQnodkP1dlHLQT7LRFfDN1QwxN+XLlAsz1Tk+24NgzeP441KmoWSvUXkq4EP3Lqjs98Q9K41amr
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=RkUMprxyD8cBVznEGV6ND4gP+1HbhdYbLCsJdJrJ3S6zVklpQvoDGrGo3gQlISvLNaC/gHh9ydXN4LAYgFiekTZdcbI29Cn/nd5s09lFDl6PAAxAV7kddyvuCxO7vzEl;
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <k0mu11+580f@eGroups.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <1532048761-1344694846-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1344902518-@b12.c18.bise6.blackberry> <k0mu11+580f@eGroups.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sensitivity: Normal


Is having cab signals how they got around having two in the cab on the dinkies? When did the fireman get pulled off?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

From: "Brian" <BM4110@verizon.net>
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:18:09 -0000
To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: Cab Signals

 

This FRA authorization came through. The dinkies are the only trains using cab signals. I have ridden the head end of #5, and they didn't have them.

One time I was a collector on a dinkey, and our cab car had a cab signal failure. Since I was conductor qualified, they required a second rules and characteristics qualified man in the cab. I rode along calling signals, and didn't have to deal with collecting fares.

--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, dhartman@... wrote:
>
> Thanks Glen. I thought I remembered them still being there in 1973 but not "usable". But I'm probably wrong (long time ago :). Doug
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@...>
> Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:07:26
> To: cbq@yahoogroups.com<cbq@yahoogroups.com>
> Reply-To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [CBQ] Re: Cab Signals
>
>
> Doug: Cab signals are no longer in service between Aurora and Savanna. Since they were only on passenger locomotives, there were no locomotives with cab signals operating on this line after May 1, 1971. The removal of the cab signal field equipment may have occurred before that date, I'm not sure. The January 1971 issue of Railway Signaling and Communications contained a news article indicating that BN had asked the FRA for permission to discontinue its automatic cab signal system on approximately 105 miles of mainline between Aurora and Savanna, Illinois, and also on all through (not commuter) passenger trains between Chicago and Aurora. The article went on to say that BN had 65 locomotives equipped with cab signals, that the cost of motive power was such that these locomotives must be utilized system-wide, and that these locomotives could be more efficiently operated over the entire system rather than being limited to Aurora-Savanna and Chicago service. The article also stated that maximum speed had already been reduced from 90 mph to 79 mph on the territory west of Aurora. I did not find any subsequent information on when the FRA approved this request. Burlington Northern Special Instructions #2, dated October 25, 1970 appears to verify the speed reduction, as it lists the maximum speed at 79 mph. The speed reduction could have occurred on that date, or by Superintendent's Bulletin prior to that date. Others on this list who may have been in train service at the time may have knowledge as to exact dates for the speed reduction and removal of the cab signal system. While the speed reduction was officially made by Special Instruction, it is my opinion (and I'm not trying to point a finger at any operating personnel) that, practically speaking, it was not adhered to. Between the fall of 1970 until Amtrak took over and passenger service was removed on the former CB&Q between Aurora and St. Croix Tower, I don't think the schedule of any first class trains was adjusted to reflect the lower maximum speed. And I personally rode two trains over the territory during this time (the eastbound Empire Builder - North Coast Limited and the westbound Morning Zephyr) and timed both trains at various locations west of Aurora at, or slightly above, 90 mph between concrete mileposts. Glen Haug
>



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>