Re: [CBQ] re: Waycar Book

["Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>]

I suspect that Randy may have had his tongue in his cheek when he posed the query!!!

 

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:26 AM

Subject: Re: [CBQ] re: Waycar Book

All this to say...rather than he (JJH)  was, rather than a Q employee...He was the Q EMPLOYER.

 

Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: John D. Mitchell, Jr. <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Jun 17, 2012 10:54 pm
Subject: Re: [CBQ] re: Waycar Book

 

He was not really "competition". He controlled the GN and NP which in turn controlled the Q. In a sense, he "owned" the Q.

From: ANDREW KOETZ <andrewkoetz@gmail.com>
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 10:41 PM
Subject: [CBQ] re: Waycar Book

 

No, James J. Hill was never a Q employee, he was the direct competition. 

Re: Waycar book

Posted by: "qmp211" mailto:milepost206@mchsi.com?Subject=+Re%3A%20Waycar%20book  qmp211

Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:57 am (PDT)

So he wasn't a Q employee?

--

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___