To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] further question about assignments of #9903 |
From: | Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com |
Date: | Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:09:34 -0500 (EST) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1323137385; bh=a057qMD1NuMwx0Bfh9jq80r/B/IH4xkDz3+a/2sCAOI=; h=Received:Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:References:To:In-Reply-To:X-MB-Message-Source:X-MB-Message-Type:X-Mailer:X-Received:Message-Id:x-aol-global-disposition:X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE:X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:x-aol-sid:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=nIsu3VbE6/DU50Bgof5gclO6iGtll9bDsUyGQAEf5CoyTlnJvfvGJVRcLK1mvo5G/ndBpYWbotL1V6xso8Fv/qwagDC5f3l3zM7u6W4npFYBfGjYHSLh2YfpRW0e+1xL |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=NQFcqvc3qwTE/ilnmegAp1LBlftx4UjfgqqGltJBqaXFipOL8wzhyTQrkQwHSXEsVdMLh827i68+EzdLvmR+wYxqQTUMDaeYka7ozElEwg13tu3AFv2EwokeQIrrR2Ql; |
In-reply-to: | <COL101-W1CA46901396F188FFFE8FCAB50@phx.gbl> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <COL101-W1CA46901396F188FFFE8FCAB50@phx.gbl> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
I really wouldn't term what they did with 9903 at Midwest Threshers a static "display"...I saw it there about 1972 shoved off to one side and totally trashed inside. I don't think it was "officially" open, but you could climb inside which I recall doing.
Pete
-----Original Message----- From: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com> To: CB&Q Group <cbq@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Mon, Dec 5, 2011 3:24 pm Subject: RE: [CBQ] further question about assignments of #9903 No, it was not operated by the new owners but was on static display on the ground of the Midwest Old Threshers Association at Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.
Hol To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com From: d.cameron@sympatico.ca Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:50:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [CBQ] further question about assignments of #9903
I've got #9903 being pulled from service on April 27, 1958. That would fit the sale dates. Was it run by the private owners between 1958 and 1963?
Duncan
__._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Re: new locomotives and cost, archie hayden |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] further question about assignments of #9903, HOL WAGNER |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] further question about assignments of #9903, Duncan Cameron |
Next by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] further question about assignments of #9903, HOL WAGNER |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |