BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Re: Peoria Interchange Question

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: Peoria Interchange Question
From: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 08:19:52 -0600
Delivered-to: archives@venus.nauer.org
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1299075606; bh=79zCmhZONsSRmu3Gnji8RcqeI4dONI15XnMmTNddnHI=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:In-Reply-To:References:Message-Id:To:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PgkYx4fe8oOXD7nAeK+PkQIOfTdQqTZuWFDsuUfKFcxdw/n6ULii541//AmLXR+HVzFsRXCF3NGuNITfH7sfJlToNuYgk+hnZMFXAM2W7Emb1pdTFYnJDbBP7Ka8BUHJ
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=WycFI6WzY5lPxWjyv7LZFrbC6Tna0wQco5ySZ5Fzl/n5MPC810xV4HPyPM8UtQihL2eGS63EEzJlotsLrLiFubwXzGNniRYHBENsd+JpHCYmCLZ2sqbHXvlyusveLtHX;
In-reply-to: <1299055580.469.91528.m7@yahoogroups.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <1299055580.469.91528.m7@yahoogroups.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Gerald and Bud,

Possibly the derail was located at that point because that may have  
been where TP&W's property line was

On Mar 2, 2011, at 2:46 AM, CBQ@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> Re: Peoria Interchange Question
> Posted by: "Gerald Edgar" vje68@hotmail.com   gaedgar66
> Tue Mar 1, 2011 7:29 am (PST)
>
>
>
>
> Excellent point as to location of the derail Bud. I have CB&Q  
> standards for derails as to the minimum distance from the fouling  
> point but no mention of a maximum distance. I assume there were  
> special situations (whether cars would roll to or from the turnout,  
> adjacent structures & tracks, etc) that would case a derail to be  
> installed 5 car lengths from a fouling post as the TP&W did. Any  
> thoughts on this? Of the derail on former Q tracks I can visualize,  
> all were relatively close to turnouts. I imagine too the standard  
> changed over the decades as cars got longer with more overhang.
>
> Gerald



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>