| To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CBQ] burlington bridge |
| From: | Stephen Levine <sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:22:32 -0800 (PST) |
| Delivered-to: | archives@venus.nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1295817761; bh=orhzRlKO+HBfzgoYTP4bbj7tiIlBMCqaXusgUU0H8zk=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:X-Received:X-Mailer:To:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AxW9aai/m2banvyWSnL57wpgBwGV/T0rqVI3ZD593YRFQ0F0h0Yx0cCxZQv+Y7m91XAsmkK5pIz/CZlRVR5Wln3mVOWnbmsFHhTstCDEljJNcqAy2WlUUFwfRga2HkwL |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=kwTdvtxanTzAxJ9ggDHcb3++MKgeS8o3ihf898Dtv5Hy1VfDRaVUSBkK7nHzcT5JJL2Xu9B48sycaaX05s0ys5cBGfDSVUESvrTCr/bBekpNMFGroZzH6YnP3QG+Do7V; |
| In-reply-to: | <75998.66505.qm@web111605.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Yes. That still is fast, but does not violate the laws of Physics <g>.
--- On Sun, 1/23/11, Bill Ewinger <bkewinger@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Bill Ewinger <bkewinger@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] burlington bridge
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 3:20 PM
febraury 15 2011is this better
--- On Sun, 1/23/11, Stephen Levine <sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Stephen Levine <sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] burlington bridge
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 9:09 PM
Wow. Making the bridge operational 10 years before its construct is indeed an
ambitious goal.
--- On Sun, 1/23/11, Bill <bkewinger@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Bill <bkewinger@yahoo.com>
Subject: [CBQ] burlington bridge
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 2:54 PM
just posted nine more pictrues to the bridge photos.pictures 65-69 will look a
little fuzzy as they were taken this afternoon in a little snow shower.picture
69 is a close up look at the west tower couter weight and as far as i know they
still have to be filled with concerte to bring them up to the correct
wieght.another piece of information was gotten this past week in that the
bridge is to be operational by february 15,2001
Bill Ewinger
Burlington Iowa
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] burlington bridge, Bill Ewinger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] burlington bridge, Bill Ewinger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] burlington bridge, Bill Ewinger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] burlington bridge, Bill Ewinger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |