BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] CBQ SW9 Question

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] CBQ SW9 Question
From: Bryan Howell <tubaman21@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1256683606; bh=d+vRfZsj3mFOomoVKNukcpyButBI9sK219udrm9S8l0=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:X-Received:X-Mailer:References:To:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FugXomLuYNvSO2Gfv4EwYvE704dQbrlssaT5VimJIbgGDSZtAYN8Ey3WWsIg8JN8npgan/C2fmCGD91T93Bk1zmLY/IhJT1nEFeEKsbw1J2Qb4imk6ugqoSqp5SW4Rwk
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=I81271O+zA8S7Df54/2orjZrs4Kpub5TWwDbh1PMbdKi8tXmMihPh3tu3+U/LnIQiPP6LrHXZrEJIRS2QWSpqakg2Gfa6dCtCmucGgRP3vJI4j/3lBRvwrl9xILArtQP;
In-reply-to: <599048.65989.qm@web38802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <AAA123F55E0742E4B077C08E9503C3C1@dell4600> <599048.65989.qm@web38802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
I think I figured out the answer to my question.  The SW1200 replaced (I 
believe) the SW9 in the catalog.  Both units were 1200hp, but the SW1200 used 
the 567C while the SW9 used the 567B.  Externally, the SW9 and SW1200 were 
virtually the same.  LifeLike released an SW9/1200 in the P2K line, but with 
SW1200 numbers.  Is this going to be a re-release with an SW9 number this time 
around?
 Bryan J. Howell
tubaman21@yahoo.com 




________________________________
From: Bryan Howell <tubaman21@yahoo.com>
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:35:26 PM
Subject: Re: [CBQ] CBQ SW9 Question

  
I can answer the first part of that question.  Yes, the Q only had 2 SW9's.  
That leads to the question of why.  Were they unhappy with them?  Power needs 
were sufficient at that time?  I'll take a look at some more info when I get 
home and see if I can dig up anything else, unless someone beats me to it.  I 
hadn't seen that announcement yet, but I look forward to possibly adding one to 
my growing roster.  Now if I only had a place to run them...
 Bryan J. Howell
tubaman21@yahoo. com 

____________ _________ _________ __
From: Nelson Moyer <ku0a@mchsi.com>
To: CBQ@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:04:35 PM
Subject: [CBQ] CBQ SW9 Question

  
I found a Q diesel locomotive roster that listed two SW9s numbered 9269 and
9270 with build dates in 1951. Does anyone know if these were the only Q
SW9s, and where these motors were assigned?

The question comes from the fact that Walthers has announced a run of SW9s
including the Blackbird scheme. I'd much rather they were SW1s, since SW1s
were much more prolific on the Q than SW9s, but I guess we're at the mercy
of the manufactuers and should be thankful for anything in the Blackbird
scheme.

Nelson Moyer

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>