BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Double heading

To: cbq@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Double heading
From: Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:07:09 -0600
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1245424089; bh=q/XZ9p/uWhZN4+uLfAcJCGlcLU971v3eChLMb4TUOQU=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:User-Agent:To:References:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kCTu3lOl18IxTIUjrEYQ+0EFY/wyyypz27Rn92jhOGXEPtUTOkOWhGh2TNutWDqbk2jljofhGSHDpXMkGjeJ5dZRv5YAMwKooHWhhlvs7iB6CpS7+hwA+VmjIpufvBAr
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=ieVvUW5cmJggpsDkVCGFY04iQQS0S4Ile2zt9VOq597IgFTbfQGQiBckVlkurPo6/OmMkL9QbGtt0CF73V7zHjPRSyH5Mj8I8jir8Pzj2f6iiY84D3iGH8v27nDuXJE5;
In-reply-to: <COL101-DS19812669CC5FA69E3A998ACA3A0@phx.gbl>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <CEE9DC0AFE29470F9E95DBEA7F68A117@STUDY> <BAY113-W218BAF31D62A44A397BF50B83A0@phx.gbl> <4A3B8D7D.7060709@worldnet.att.net> <COL101-DS19812669CC5FA69E3A998ACA3A0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071113)
HOL WAGNER wrote:
> Norm:  Post if you wish.
>  
> I photographed and chased doubleheaded SW1s (9143 and 9145) on the Q 
> branch between Sterling, Colo., and Cheyenne, Wyo., in the early 1960s.
>  
> Hol Wagner
> 
>      Gerald & Virginia Edgar wrote:
>      >
>      > These very interesting posts began with the premise that
>     doubleheading was only a steam loco phenomena but we need to
>     remember many early diesels did NOT M.U.  I personally do not know
>     of CB&Q diesels being doubleheaded that were not MU'ed but there is
>     a lot of literature about the Milw using 3 & 4 non-MU'ed SW-1's,
>     each with it's own crew, to operate across southern Minnesota (a
>     line with light bridges that would not handle road units).  They
>     followed the same procedures that have been cited in the posts here. 
>      >
>      > 
>      >
>      > As for communications with even a singe engine, well into the
>     70's, BN on ex-Q trackage had crews that relied heavily on lantern &
>     whistle signals to communicate because they did not have radios (the
>     Aurora-West Chicago line being an example)   Check any CB&Q Rule
>     Book (or other RR's for that matter as the signals were uniform) for
>     all the actions that could be initated by certain lantern motions or
>     series of whistle blasts.  It's a lost art but I am sure there are
>     times today when a crew with b/o radios wish the newbies could truly
>     "communicate".   Gerald
>      >



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>