To: | cbq@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Double heading |
From: | Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@worldnet.att.net> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:07:09 -0600 |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1245424089; bh=q/XZ9p/uWhZN4+uLfAcJCGlcLU971v3eChLMb4TUOQU=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:User-Agent:To:References:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kCTu3lOl18IxTIUjrEYQ+0EFY/wyyypz27Rn92jhOGXEPtUTOkOWhGh2TNutWDqbk2jljofhGSHDpXMkGjeJ5dZRv5YAMwKooHWhhlvs7iB6CpS7+hwA+VmjIpufvBAr |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=ieVvUW5cmJggpsDkVCGFY04iQQS0S4Ile2zt9VOq597IgFTbfQGQiBckVlkurPo6/OmMkL9QbGtt0CF73V7zHjPRSyH5Mj8I8jir8Pzj2f6iiY84D3iGH8v27nDuXJE5; |
In-reply-to: | <COL101-DS19812669CC5FA69E3A998ACA3A0@phx.gbl> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <CEE9DC0AFE29470F9E95DBEA7F68A117@STUDY> <BAY113-W218BAF31D62A44A397BF50B83A0@phx.gbl> <4A3B8D7D.7060709@worldnet.att.net> <COL101-DS19812669CC5FA69E3A998ACA3A0@phx.gbl> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071113) |
HOL WAGNER wrote: > Norm: Post if you wish. > > I photographed and chased doubleheaded SW1s (9143 and 9145) on the Q > branch between Sterling, Colo., and Cheyenne, Wyo., in the early 1960s. > > Hol Wagner > > Gerald & Virginia Edgar wrote: > > > > These very interesting posts began with the premise that > doubleheading was only a steam loco phenomena but we need to > remember many early diesels did NOT M.U. I personally do not know > of CB&Q diesels being doubleheaded that were not MU'ed but there is > a lot of literature about the Milw using 3 & 4 non-MU'ed SW-1's, > each with it's own crew, to operate across southern Minnesota (a > line with light bridges that would not handle road units). They > followed the same procedures that have been cited in the posts here. > > > > > > > > As for communications with even a singe engine, well into the > 70's, BN on ex-Q trackage had crews that relied heavily on lantern & > whistle signals to communicate because they did not have radios (the > Aurora-West Chicago line being an example) Check any CB&Q Rule > Book (or other RR's for that matter as the signals were uniform) for > all the actions that could be initated by certain lantern motions or > series of whistle blasts. It's a lost art but I am sure there are > times today when a crew with b/o radios wish the newbies could truly > "communicate". Gerald > > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Double heading, Gerald & Virginia Edgar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Double heading, Russ Strodtz |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Double heading, Gerald & Virginia Edgar |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Double heading, Russ Strodtz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |