BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [SPAM][CBQ] Rochelle Depot

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [SPAM][CBQ] Rochelle Depot
From: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:00:57 -0600
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=aOmvEce67x/IW/Jr/IKIvCBHgiQMM/fIroCt7v43RTQvTB3mcjMoKQmD2+aUwtpILaQG200GNEQEX7fKB1eW0n5FOjKeUIzUuz2HsE9hlPMqModSCBZt36RbT5pbewp8;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <1198157317.541.47824.m46@yahoogroups.com> <4DFF547E-6B64-42C5-86FC-499263DE3323@gmail.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Bill Barber,

An excellent point on Mr. Barber.  I see no sense that items that are
just old areas with little logic and with an unnecessary piece of the long
past of the unknown . 

Russ 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William Barber" <clipperw@gmail.com>
To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, 20 December, 2007 19:07
Subject: Re: [SPAM][CBQ] Rochelle Depot


> Robby and all,
> 
> I suspect that the depot and others like it had three problems from  
> the BNSF's standpoint:
> 
> 1. No specific current use or business need.
> 
> 2. Ongoing and possible significant maintenance and maybe some  
> upcoming major expense such as a roof.
> 
> 3. Significant annual property taxes paid to the city and county.
> 
> Tearing it down probably provided immediate relief for all of the  
> above. Giving such things away to the city or others probably  
> involves considerable additional expenses in legal fees and  
> investigation to find a suitable donee who can taken on the various   
> responsibilities involved with ownership (insurance, maintenance and  
> possibly taxes. Remember, for many smaller towns, the largest tax  
> payer is often the railroad passing through it. The town may not have  
> wanted the depot because it would reduce the tax rolls and transfer  
> all the responsibility and expense to them. I recall that years ago,  
> BN started tearing down the old Galesburg in the middle of the night  
> to avoid a public outcry to save it. From the RR's standpoint, the  
> old depot was very expensive facility to maintain and was no longer  
> needed for RR operations. The RR is a business and making money is  
> their goal. Like it or not, nostalgia is not a money maker and having  
> a depot museum next to their tracks is probably a liability.
> 
> Bill Barber
> 
> 



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>