In the interest of full disclosure I think that there was a provision for
connecting a hose directly to the steam dome which would, of course, provide
steam in a much greater volume and it would have been "pure" steam as opposed
to
the steam and water which would be produced at the lower level in the boiler
where the squirt hose was connected.
If heavier volume of steam was needed for thawing it may have been with a
hose from the dome...Of course you realize that just "any old hose" wouldn't be
safe to use with 250-300 psi steam in someone's hand.
Maybe Karl could enlighten the delegation as to the finer points of using
engine steam for thawing.
Pete
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|