BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Re: VO1000

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: VO1000
From: <kohlj@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:01:52 -0500
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
As well, the Michael Spoor Burlington Route in Color (vol 3, I believe, Iowa & 
Missouri) shows the 4 stack modification on the V01000s, don't have a page 
number as I'm not near my book...


> 
> From: "Dale DeWitt" <dcdewi@aol.com>
> Date: 2004/12/08 Wed PM 01:35:46 EST
> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [CBQ] Re: VO1000
> 
> 
> 
> Todd,
> The answer to your VO-1000 stack question as frequently happens 
> probably depends on what time period you are modeling and which of 
> the two versions, #9353 or #9365, of the Stewart model you 
> purchased.  Best I can remember, the CB&Q units were delivered in 
> 1943 & 1944 with a single stack located on center back by the cab.  
> Overheating problems prompted several alternate manifold and stack 
> arrangement s by different railroads including the CB&Q. I don't have 
> a website link but I can give you 3 excellent references.
> 
> 1.Alfred Holck's book, "Burlington Route Color Pictorial Vol 1" 
> published by Four Ways West ~1994.  Page 58 has 1960-1961 color 
> photos of both #9353 and 9365 with four tall stacks located just to 
> the left(fireman's side) of the hood centerline.  The photo of #9354 
> has four short stacks located simliarly also taken in late 1960.  On 
> the opposing page are photos of #9372 & 9374 with only one short 
> stack back near the cab with one photo taken in 1958 and the other in 
> 1964.  
> 
> 2.Article by Charlie Roth in "Railway Prototype Cyclopedia Vol 8 in 
> 2003.  Page 50 shows #9372 in Chicago 1961 with its orginal single 
> stack and #9358 in Kansas City in 1961 with the modified medium 
> heigth 4 stack arrangement.  The article notes that units assigned to 
> the Chicago area tended to keep their original single stack 
> arrangement and the Kansas City unis tended to be converted to one of 
> the 4 stack arrangements.
> 
> 3. Numerous articles by Paul Withers published in the Diesel Era 
> magazine over many issues.  The CB&Q is covered in the Nov/Dec 2002 
> Vol 13 No 6 issue. It includes 6 photos of CB&Q units #9350, 9358, 
> 9363, 9366, 9370 and one 1943 as delivered unit in solid black where 
> the number is not visible.  Again there is a mixture of single stack 
> and 4 stack units.  These photos seem to support the idea that single 
> stacks tended to remain on the Chicago units and modified 4 stack 
> arrangements became common on the Kansas City units.  One would have 
> to dig deeper if you need to know when the 4 stack modifications 
> occurred.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Dale DeWitt
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "tshryock" <tshryock@y...> wrote:
> > 
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > I have a Stewart VO1000 but the stacks have to be installed per the 
> > prototype -- and I don't have a picture of the CBQ version. 
> > 
> > Does anyone have a link to a photo that would show the stack 
> > placement -- or can someone describe it?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Todd
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/8ZCslB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CBQ] Re: VO1000, kohlj <=