BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Tunnels

To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Tunnels
From: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:04:02 -0500
References: <aojqj7+8ggr@e...>
Reply-to: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>
Tom,

I know this does not really help but the 3 or 4 times a day
"Pingers" from Dubuque to East Cabin would certainly
have gone thru a tunnel every trip.

That would be an interesting location to model but very difficult
to try and get the river bridge worked in. The geography is a
little strange with the IC pointed towards the Northwest before
they reach East Cabin. Then they take a slight turn to the right
to enter the tunnel and then a quarter turn or more within the
tunnel. At the same time the "Q" is taking about a quarter turn
to the right around the bluff and the diamond ends up being
almost a perfect 90 degrees. This gives them a right angle
crossing of the river which, of course, makes for the shortest
bridge. An elegant solution to an engineering problem and I
don't think you could do it any better today.

Of course CB&Q transfers would have also gone through the
tunnels going up the hill in St Paul on the NP.

Russ
----- Original Message -----
From: "thommack" <mack@c...>
To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 October, 2002 08:46
Subject: [BRHSlist] Tunnels


> The mention in a recent post by Cy Svobodny about the tunnels in
> Wisconsin on the Milw and C&NW got me to thinking. Where, if
> anywhere, did the Q run through tunnels on Lines East, particularly
> Illinois, Wisconsin, or Minnesota? Reason: On my layout I have a
> rather conspicuous cutoff to staging that I originally designed to be
> hidden inside a tunnel (just haven't gotten the mountain built yet).
> Although I don't really didn't have a geographical area in mind when
> I started my layout, I am leaning toward the Illinois, Wisconsin,
> Minnesota area so I can: 1) run my coal train with 3-4 SD7's from
> Illinois coal area to a powerplant up north (ala the Wisconsin Power
> unit trains); 2) interchange with C&NW and/or Milw so I can run some
> Baldwins, Alcos, and F-M's on interchange and transfers. My time era
> is 1967-68.
>
> I realize I certainly have modeler's freedom here, but the mention of
> the tunnels in Wisconsin got me to thinking.
>
> Tom Mack
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>