--- In BRHSlist@y..., John Mitchell <cbqrr47@y...> wrote:
> You are correct Pete, no checking the register for
> extras, unless the DS says so.
> John
> --- PSHedgpeth@a... wrote:
> > RE: Train register checking. I believe, if memory
> > serves correctly, that
> > the rules specifically forbade checking the train
> > register against an extra
> > train unless authorized to do so by the dispatcher.
> >
> > The Colorado case sited is the reason for the
> > prohibition. An engine could
> > make more than one trip as an extra in one day, or
> > as in the instant case
> > another trip tomorrow.
> >
> > Pete Hedgpeth
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> >
> > As I undestand the rules of that era, that makes sense
because an extra train is inferior to class and direction, unless
given rights by the DS via a train order. Why check a register for
an inferior train? I thought the purpose of the register was for
inferior trains to determine whether a superior train has arrived,
or not.
Ed DeRouin
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
|